Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Religion Is Necessary free essay sample

Date Everyday people turn on the television or the Internet and see all sorts of stories, murders committed, hunger strikes, boycotts, elections, company mergers, etc. All of these things make people look at the world in a different light. Even though people want to believe that this information is completely accurate, it is mostly biased or one sided, just like religion. With this being said one of the main factors in government that causes so much conflict and collision is religion. This is because religion is a worldwide phenomenon that can lead to both conflict and peace, depending on the way one looks upon it. Although in some cases religion may cause strife between countries, the reality of it is that without religion correlating with state affairs at all, the government would simply not function. Joseph Ashby seconds that statement in his article â€Å"Is Religion Necessary† when he states how important religion is in order to have freedom. Albright furthers this argument when she portrays the importance of the role religion has on diplomatic efforts in her essay â€Å"Faith and Diplomacy†. Thomas Freidman also touches upon the topic of international diplomacy when he encourages peace and cooperation between nations that may not always see eye to eye in his essay â€Å"The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention†. All three authors show how the government of the United States is far more complicated than what meets the eye and paints a vivid picture of how there is a brighter future in store for the world if only nations would use their differences to their advantage. â€Å"They should develop the ability to recognize where and how religious beliefs contribute to conflicts and when religious principles might be invoked to ease strife. (Alrbright 24). The role of in foreign policy has the potential to impact the world and make connections between nations stronger and more efficient if only we would let it. It is important to recognize the conflicts of human dignity and exemplify the relation to society before improvements can be made, one of them being the way people are governed. The founding fathers originally intended for the people to govern themselves since there were few restricting laws. However â€Å"Self governance cannot function without morality. As morals decline, laws xpand and freedoms necessarily contract† (Ashby 1). Since society is changing so fast there are several steps that the government should take in order to increase cooperation amongst nations. Few mountains must be climbed in order to see the true value religion and other factors can have on ties between nations. Separation of church and state, as stated in the first amendment, is our government’s policy to keep religion and governmental affairs separate from one another. This being said, Americans find it extremely difficult to let the role of religion take place in diplomatic affairs. The only Constitutional solution to these problems is to depend on citizens sense of morality† (Ashby 1). Due to the separation of church and state, many argue that r eligion has no place in diplomatic affairs at all. â€Å"There are so many who take personally any mention of religion in a public context, perceiving it as an attack on non-religious, moral individuals† (Ashby 1). People should however instead take the comments about religion as a way of announcing the basic moral principles of life. What society is not opening their eyes to is that if the U. S ambassadors can relate to religion without taking faith-based approaches towards diplomacy for their own personal advancements, than religion can contribute to several foreign situations in numerous ways. â€Å"The resurgence of religious feeling will continue to influence world events. American policy-makers cannot afford to ignore this; on balance they should welcome it. †(Albright 31). When religious input is used for the right reasons, it can do tremendous things. â€Å"These and many other classic geopolitical conflicts could erupt at any time and either slow the flattening of the world, or seriously unflatten it. (Friedman 124) Although there is a chance that the role of religion could cause conflict, it is a chance worth taking. There are so many powerful actions that can be made based on faith and politics that can benefit America and the ties with other nations especially with all of the modern communication. From video streaming to the Internet to television broad casting, people are relayed all sorts of information all around the world. Friedman’s Dell theory is a perfect example yet very complex and there is both good and bad parts when it comes to this theory. Friedman states, â€Å"Countries whose workers and industries are woven into a major global supply chain know that they cannot take an hour, a week, or a month off for war without disrupting industries and economies around the world and thereby risking the loss of their place in that supply chain for a long time, which could be extremely costly† (Friedman 126). People who are part of a chain, as in the Dell Company, think twice before causing a war with countries that are also a part of that chain. They do this mainly because a war could result in the loss of that chain of work. Being that big companies such as different franchises bring in a lot of profit for that country, war with another country working with the same company would be very detrimental. This kind of work tends to have people feel differently about countries in which they might have felt badly about originally. It also makes countries become allies in the sense that they need each other in order for business and for profit to be able to continue on. Even though the conflict prevention theory can keep countries together and sane not all people agree with this sense of connectivity. From an outside perspective people grasp a total different perception on the countries, usually this is due to diverse religious beliefs. People still resort to terrorism to get these points across and businesses and franchises cannot do anything to stop that. Friedman says, â€Å"since the Dell Theory offers no hope of restraining the suicide supply chains, the only strategy we have is to limit their worst capabilities† (Friedman 133). Unfortunately the Internet makes this concept extremely difficult because anyone can access the Internet at any time and the security of online data is not one hundred percent reliable. This information and the easy access to it changes the way people view their world. One may argue that faith must be common between two nations in order for them to cooperate. If two nations have enough respect for one another and are willing to share faith based ideas in order to benefit each other, than that should be substantial enough for peace to be maintained. This is why Nations can no longer put the idea of faith behind closed doors. When welcomed into diplomatic affairs, religion can cause beneficial advancements between nations and do so much more, but that is only if we use it for the right reasons. Faith is an extremely strong force that most individuals hold near and dear to their heart. Faith is not just something one can leave out of their every-day lives. â€Å"There are people who are willing to die-and kill-for their faith. † (Albright 26). Therefore there is no avoiding the idea of religion and faith completely. Religion was around before the government was even established. As long as it has been around faith has played a part in the functionality of the government, whether people were in favor of it or not. Faith has effected laws since discrimination in the 1950’s, and continues to have an effect on laws today dealing with things such as abortion. Rather than trying to dismiss the ideas of religion in diplomatic affairs, one should try and interoperate religion from another point of view and see what ideas it can bring to the table. In any conflict, reconciliation becomes possible when the antagonists cease dehumanizing each other and behind to see a bit of themselves in their enemy† ( Albright 28). We can try and ostracize religion from our diplomatic affairs as much as we want, but we all know it will always remain present. â€Å" But religious motivations do not disappear simply because they are not mentioned; more often they lie dormant only to rise up again at the least convenient moment. †(Albright 28). As human beings, we have very strong and distinct beliefs based off of faith engraved in our brains since a young age. These beliefs do not just diminish over-night. We stand firm by these beliefs and connect them to things that occur in our every-day lives. There is no escaping faith. â€Å"The rights enumerated in the Constitution are wholly inadequate in creating a well-ordered society† (Ashby 1). Therefore, as a whole, nations should embrace the impact religious factors can have and open-mindedly use them to their own benefit. Works Cited Albright, Madeleine. â€Å"Faith and Diplomacy,† Emerging: Contemporary Readings for Writers Ed. Barclay Barrios. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2010. Pp 23-33. Print. Friedman, Thomas. â€Å"The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention,† Emerging: Contemporary Readings for Writers Ed. Barclay Barrios. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2010. Pp 120-140. Print. Ashby, Joseph. Is Religion Necessary? Archived-Articles:. Archived-Articles:, 3 Jan. 2009. Web. 19 Mar. 2012. lt;http://www. americanthinker. com/2009/01/is_religion_necessary. htmlgt;. DON’T KNOW IF THE CITATION IS RIGHT HERE IS THE LINK IF YOU WANT TO REDO IT †¦ http://www. americanthinker. com/2009/01/is_religion_necessary. html

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

Who Killed Romeo Kenny Lee 10S Essay Example For Students

Who Killed Romeo? Kenny Lee 10S Essay Romeo and Juliet is the perfect example of the term love and loss. It is a tragic tale where two young lovers are restricted from each other because of tensions between their families. Misfortune, chance and their love for each other, triggers events, which soon lead to their deaths. It is clear that the two lovers had killed themselves but we cannot say that it was entirely their faults. There are many factors, which play a big part in the events leading up to this tragic ending. If we were to trace the events of the book all the way back, we would notice that one of the most obvious reasons for their deaths is the family feud between the Montagues and the Capulets. A very good example of a scene which shows this is where Tybalt and the other Capulets challenge the Montagues and Mercutio to a fight, simply because they didnt like the idea of Romeo, a Montague showing up at a Capulets ball. Mercutio is killed in this scene, and Romeo enraged, avenges his friend by seeking and killing Tybalt. This leads up to his exile and finally to his death. We will write a custom essay on Who Killed Romeo? Kenny Lee 10S specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The feud also had very significant effects on the lovers themselves. This quote from Romeo, Is she a Capulet, O dear account, my life is my foes debt, and this from Juliet, My only love has sprung from my only hate, proves that they were quite upset and knew that trouble would surely come out of their love for each other. If the feud between the families had not existed, they would have been able to announce their love openly. They need not be afraid of anyone restricting them for each other thus avoiding many unnecessary incidents, such as Paris death. If we take the matter further, we can see that a lot of the dreadful events leading up to the lovers deaths were plainly due to chance. This is even mentioned in the prologue, which states, whose misadventured piteous overthrows. We can see this in the beginning when Romeo and Benvolio just so happens to come across Peter, a Capulet servant. Peter, an illiterate asks them for help in reading an invitation card to the Capulet ball. Benvolio, seeing Romeos melancholy mood, grabs the chance and convinces Romeo to the ball. If Romeo hadnt gone to the ball, he would have not met Juliet then and there would not have been any problems. We can also class the death of Mercutio as an accident. When Tybalt and Mercutio start fighting, Romeo tries to stop them. His interference however is fatal for Mercutio who is stabbed by Tybalts blade. This quote from Romeo, I thought all for the best, shows that he had not meant in anyway for anything like that to happen. It was merely an accident but Romeo, angered and lost in his own thoughts, kills Tybalt anyway. In contrast with this, we can also say that it was fate, and that the whole tragedy was already foretold in the stars. The story itself has made such a suggestion in the prologue, which describes Romeo and Juliet as star- crossed lovers. Fate and destiny has always been connected with the reading of stars and astrology. Perhaps it was the lovers fate to die and to mend the centuries old feud between the Montagues and Capulets. As we progress through the story, we can see that some of the blame concerning Romeo and Juliets deaths can be rested upon the other characters in the story. An example is Capulet who forces Juliet into marrying Paris. Juliet is enraged with the arrangement by her father and goes into a desperate frenzy. Juliet, lost and quite scared, follows the friars plan without much considering of the possible consequences. Indirectly, Juliets father can be blamed for the death of the lovers. .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd , .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd .postImageUrl , .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd , .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd:hover , .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd:visited , .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd:active { border:0!important; } .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd:active , .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u2de84ea86b0e1f3d0b086d4db2db18dd:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: With close reference to the text explore Shakespeare's presentation of Romeo through reference to at least three key scenes EssayFriar Lawrence also had quite a significant part in the whole fixation. He clearly plays a big part in the causes of Romeos and Juliets deaths. Although his motives were for good, as proven in this quote, To turn your households rancor into pure love, he still takes many unnecessary risks for in the process. The fact that he also tries to conceal himself from the public in each deed he does, shows that he was never quite sure of his motives. Friar Lawrence was responsible for marrying the two lovers secretly, which could have very well caused hug e fights between the two houses. He takes this risk anyway, not thinking of probable consequences. He is also responsible for devising the plan where Juliet was to take drug and pretend to be dead for 40 hours until her Romeo would come. The plan is very unstable as much of it depends on the letter being sent to Romeo in time. His plan simply backfires when he could not manage to send his letter. Romeo comes back, sees Juliet dead and kills himself. Juliet then wakes up and sees Romeo dead and kills herself too. Friar Lawrences folly clearly has a part in the causes of Romeo and Juliets deaths. However, we must not avoid the fact that it was still Romeos and Juliets own folly that led them to their deaths. Other than the fact that they killed themselves, the two lovers have also proved to be quite spoilt in some ways throughout the story. Romeos one main tendency is that he always obsesses. We can see this in the way he talks of Rosaline. He talks of her as the sun and thinks that no one can be as beautiful as she can. There is also very little we know of her character except that she is beautiful because Romeo only cares about her physical appearances. This reflects on Romeos attitude towards women. He does the same to Juliet whom he had just met. This tendency to obsess clearly has a part to play in his decision to kill himself and to lie with Juliet even in death. Although we have managed to place some of the blame of Tybalts death and Romeos exile on other reasons, we cannot use them as excuses for the fact that Romeos own faults. Romeo was a victim of his own lust for vengeance. He does not think of the possible consequences but instead tries to dismiss them and only realizes them at the last minute. He says this after he kills Tybalt, O, I am fortunes fool. He realizes what he has done is also fatal for himself and regrets the killing. Juliet acts a lot like a child throughout the story. This can be seen in the scene where she suddenly hates the nurse simply because she did not agree with her on not marrying Paris. She also cries in order to convince the Friar on helping her. This child- like behavior proves that she is irresponsible and that she does not care of the possible consequences but only on what is happening at that present time. She does not think twice and quickly demands the potion from the friar when offered to her, Give me, give me; tell me not of fear. As already explained, many factors play a part in the events leading up to the main climax where the lovers die. It might not be entirely the fault of the lovers, but a lot of the blame should still lie on their shoulders. We cannot dismiss the fact that the one true killers are still the lovers themselves.

Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Metamorphis By Franz Kafka

Metamorphis By Franz Kafka Family duty January 14, 2002 Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka Family Duty In Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka, family duty to Gregor meant to pay all the debts that his family had and also to pay all of their bills. In order to do make his family happy, he went to the same boring job every day. Gregor dedicated all of his earnings to his family; he thought that he owed it to his family to stay at home and be miserable so his family could be lazy and stay home and live off of him. Gregor felt he had no choice, no free will about how life was going to be; he couldn't change anything. Even if Gregor had second thoughts about doing something different, he would then think again about what he originally thought about, and felt remorseful for thinking anything different than what life had brought him.Then one morning Gregor woke up and this weird change had happened, he was a dung beetle.Gregor Books and Giraffe HeroesHis alarm clock didn't go off, and now he heard his boss out in the living room talking to his family. Gregor knew that if he didn't work, his family would get mad at him and wouldn't have any money to eat on. Then they would have to get jobs; but that wouldn't work because then they would talk trash at Gregor for not working, even though he had been supporting the whole family for a long time now.When Gregor looked out into the living room, everyone saw him and almost panicked. His boss ran out of the room and even fell down the stairs. Seeing this Gregor then realized his horrible appearance and tried to talk to his family. Thinking that they (his family) could hear him, he explained that everything was...

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Optical Illusions essays

Optical Illusions essays The question What is an illusion? is one that, at first glance, is strikingly simple to answer. Yet, it has eluded many a psychologist until the latter half of the twentieth century, when the workings of our psyche and the processes that underlie it became apparent to those that devoted their lives to the cause of its understanding. Upon further inspection, one realizes that optical illusions are not simply just that they consist of the misinterpretations of sensory stimuli that can be attributed to many reasons, which vary from depth cues to the context within which an image is viewed. Thus, considering the complexity and depth of such a subject matter, it becomes evident and understandable that our quest to understand perceptual illusions has been a long and arduous journey. In order to define the concept of an illusion, an idea central to our discussion, we must refer to the psychological processes of sensation and perception. Let us begin by examining the processes that concern sensation. Our bodies, and for that matter most living things, have special cells called sensory receptors. They can detect light, sound, temperature, pressure, odour, taste, pain, pressure, and balance, among other things. Most of these receptors are on or near the surface of the body such as our eyes, ears, and tongue, but some are internal. Thus, we sometimes classify feelings of pain that are generated from certain regions of the body as those resulting from such elusive, but commonplace, conditions as a toothache or a headache. Each sensory receptor detects its own special form of energy, transduces the aforementioned energy, and transmits a signal to the brain. The reception of the signal in the brain represents sensation. How the brain interprets these signals and makes them meaningful is called perception. Most of the time the interpretation of the received energy is consistent with it. Sometimes, however, our interpretation...

Thursday, November 21, 2019

State Research Elements that Influence State Government Essay

State Research Elements that Influence State Government - Essay Example Members are encouraged to vote for these state and local leaders presented by the union. Another way they seek to influence state government is through their Political Action Committee called Political Action Committee for Education (PACE). Pace contributions are given separately from union dues. This money is used for lobbying and election contributions. PSEA spent nearly $1,000,000 on lobbying salaries and efforts for FY 2006-2007. Democratic candidates are the main recipients of PSEA member and PACE contributions. Many of these candidates favor increased funding for public schools, blocking voucher programs that would send public money to private schools and merit pay for teachers. These initiatives have been identified as some of the most troubling issues for teachers and PSEA members in Pennsylvania. Traditionally, Democratic candidates have been able to count on PSEA as an ally in most elections in districts where education is an issue. Republicans in Pennsylvania have usually been in opposition to PSEA in every way. The whole concept of unionized public sector employees upsets many Republicans. They often point out the fact that some school districts require all members to pay a portion of dues even if they do not join the PSEA. These sorts of ideological and structural differences between the PSEA and Republican Party have traditionally kept them on opposite sides of legislation that seeks to weaken unions or change rules. The effects of the PSEA on state elections is debatable, especially in a weak economy. Pennsylvania has experienced a record number of teacher furloughs since the economic downturn began in 2008. The localized structure of public education in Pennsylvania weakens the effectiveness of PSEA at the state level as well. Pennsylvania is divided into 501 independent local school districts. Each one of these districts has a school board that oversees local expenses and

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

Animal Testing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Animal Testing - Essay Example Animal testing has also contributed to understanding how to treat malaria, Leukemia, and other major diseases that eliminated a very high number of human populations in the past. The animal is the best research subjects because they share similar characteristics with human beings. For instance, Chimpanzees has 99% DNA similarity with humans (Hayhurst, 2000). In addition, mice are almost genetically similar to human beings. Due to these similarities, they are susceptible to the same diseases that affect human beings. There are very many ethical considerations that might be observed when using human subjects. This is mainly when testing medicines that are of high toxin levels. In such cases, the lives of human beings should not be put in any form of danger (Watson, 2009). Therefore, the test of human beings should be preceded by that of human beings.Animals have also benefited immensely in the testing. Many deadly diseases such as rabies, tetanus, anthrax, etc could not have been contr olled if animal testing was not conducted. Moreover, more animals could have been swept off by the diseases and become extinct. As a result, the testing has major benefits on animal species (Watson, 2009). Animals used for testing have a shorter lifespan than human beings. For instance, a mouse has a lifespan of two to three years (Hayhurst, 2000). Therefore, while testing a medicine that affects a whole lifespan of a human being, it’s easier to get quick results when using animals rather than human beings.

Sunday, November 17, 2019

Position of women in 16 and 17 century Essay Example for Free

Position of women in 16 and 17 century Essay Women were challenged with expressing themselves in a patriarchal system that generally refused to grant merit to womens views. Cultural and political events during these centuries increased attention to womens issues such as education reform. Though modern feminism was non-existent. The social structure women limited opportunities for involvement; they served largely as managers of their households. Women were expected to focus on practical domestic pursuits and activities that encouraged the betterment of their families, and more particularly, their husbands. Education for women was not supported—harmful to the traditional female virtues of innocence and morality. Women who spoke out against the patriarchal system of gender roles, or any injustice, ran the risk of being exiled from their communities, or worse; vocal unmarried women in particular were the targets of witch-hunts. The seventeenth century women continued to play a significant, though not acknowledged, role in economic and political structures through their primarily domestic activities.They often acted as counselors in the home, tempering their husbands words and actions. Women were discouraged from directly expressing political views counter to their husbands or to broadly condemn established systems; nevertheless, many women were able to make public their private views through the veil of personal, religious writings. Marriage: The seventeenth century represents a fascinating period of English history, drawing the attention of whole generations of historians. This turbulent age saw three major events that had a deep impact on England’ s political as well as social life—the English Revolution, the Restoration of the Stuarts in 1660 and the Glorious Revolution in 1688. Amidst the turmoil of the events, people’s everyday lives unfolded. While it was men’s preoccupation to keep the country’s political and economic affairs going, women had an indispensable, though far less public, part to play. This paper aims at providing an outline of the seventeenth-century English marriage, viewed from the woman’s perspective. It touches upon topics such as concluding marriages, basic marriage values, duties of a married woman and possibilities of divorce. Attention is paid to the areas in which the  seventeenth-century reality was different from today’s. In seventeenth-century England, marriage and sexual morals played a far more important social role than nowadays. A family centred around a married couple represented the basic social, economic and political unit. In the Stuart period, a husband’s â€Å"rule† over his wife, children and servants was seen as an analogy to the king’s reign over his people—a manifestation of a hierarchy constituted by God. A woman was regarded as the ‘weaker vessel’ (a phrase taken from the New Testament)—a creature physically, intellectually, morally and even spiritually inferior to a man; therefore, the man had a right to dominate her (Fraser 1981: 1). In a society strongly influenced by Puritan values, sexual integrity and the status of a married person gave a woman respectability and social prestige. This, together with the fact that it was very difficult for women to find ways of making an independent living, meant that securing a husband was a matter of great importance. Theoretically, it was possible for two people to marry very young. The minimum legal age was 12 years for women and 14 years for men. In addition, it was possible for the couple to get engaged at the age of 7, with the right to break off the engagement on reaching the minimum age of consent (Stone 1965: 652). However, early marriages were rather rare—the average age of the newlyweds was about 25 years. Interestingly, the basic requirement for a legally valid marriage was not a formal consecration in a church, but the completion of a marriage contract, commonly called ‘spousals’. Spousals were an act in which the bride and groom said their vows in the present tense—‘per verba de prasenti’ (Ingram 1987: 126). In a majority of cases, this procedure was accompanied by a church ceremony (banns). Yet if the marriage was concluded without witnesses and not consecrated in a church, it had the same legal validity. This practice had existed in England since the twelfth century and lasted till 1753. Not having to go through a church ceremony made it possible for lovers to marry secretly, without the knowledge of their parents. In this way, they could escape the dynastic scheming of their families.